The Permanent Portfolio
Harry Browne's four-way split — 25% each in stocks, long-term bonds, gold and cash — built to stay calm through any economy, with almost nothing to manage.
The allocation
Four equal quarters, and that's the whole thing. The genius is in why those four: each one is chosen to do well in a different economic condition, so whatever the world throws at markets, one or two sleeves are always pulling their weight.
One sleeve for every economy
Harry Browne's insight was that the economy is always in one of four broad states, and a different asset leads in each:
You never have to guess which state you're in — you own all four all the time, and simply rebalance back to 25% each when a sleeve drifts.
Example ETFs
Low-cost ETFs that fill each quarter, for both a US and a European (UCITS) investor. These are examples, not recommendations.
| Asset class | Weight | US ETF | Europe (UCITS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| US stocks (S&P 500) | 25% | VOO | SXR8 IE00B5BMR087 |
| Long-term govt bonds | 25% | TLT | IBGL IE00B1FZS913 |
| Gold | 25% | IAU | XGDU DE000A1E0HR8 |
| Cash / short-term govt | 25% | SGOV | XEON LU0290358497 |
Who was Harry Browne?
Harry Browne was an American investment writer and free-market thinker who laid out the Permanent Portfolio in his 1980s books. His pitch was radical simplicity: most investors lose money trying to predict markets, so build one allocation that never needs a forecast, set it, and get on with your life. Decades later it remains a favourite of investors who prize a good night's sleep over the last percentage point of return.
What to expect
The Permanent Portfolio is a preservation-first strategy. Returns are modest — think mid-single digits over the long run — but the ride is remarkably smooth, with shallow drawdowns even in bad years. The price of that calm is real: with a quarter in cash and a quarter in gold, it will badly lag a stock-heavy portfolio during bull markets. If maximum long-run growth is the goal, this isn't it; if sleeping through crashes is the goal, few things do it better.
Permanent Portfolio vs All-Weather
These two often get mentioned together, and for good reason — both balance risk across economic conditions rather than betting on one. The differences:
- Simplicity. The Permanent Portfolio is four equal 25% sleeves. The All-Weather Portfolio uses five uneven sleeves.
- Cash vs commodities. Permanent holds 25% cash and no commodities; All-Weather holds no cash but adds a commodities sleeve.
- Bonds. All-Weather leans much harder on long-term bonds (about 40%) and splits across maturities; Permanent keeps a single 25% long-bond sleeve.
Limitations
- Cash & gold drag. Half the portfolio sits in assets that don't compound like stocks, so it lags in long bull markets.
- Rate risk. The long-term bond sleeve falls when interest rates rise.
- Gold can stagnate. Gold pays no income and can go a decade sideways.
- Modest returns. Calm comes at the cost of a lower long-run number.
Frequently asked questions
What is the Permanent Portfolio allocation?
What returns does the Permanent Portfolio produce?
How is it different from the All-Weather Portfolio?
What are the downsides?
Build the Permanent Portfolio in st-ox
Load this 25/25/25/25 allocation straight into the Rebalance tool, switch between US and European ETFs, and project a lump sum or monthly contributions over any horizon. Free, no ads.
Open st-ox free →For information and educational purposes only. Not investment advice, and not a recommendation to buy or sell any security or to adopt any strategy. Tickers are examples of funds that track each asset class, not endorsements.